歡迎來(lái)到上海新航道學(xué)校官網(wǎng)!英語(yǔ)高能高分,就上新航道!
2019/5/22 14:56:34來(lái)源:新航道作者:新航道
摘要:每場(chǎng)雅思考試之后,新航道上海學(xué)校雅思頻道小編會(huì)第一時(shí)間分享每次雅思考試大作文范文及解析,希望對(duì)各位備考考生們有所幫助,對(duì)雅思寫作有所提高!本文是5月4日雅思大作文范文及解析:廣泛使用新技術(shù)讓年輕人更容易找工作嗎。
每場(chǎng)雅思考試之后,新航道上海學(xué)校雅思頻道小編會(huì)第一時(shí)間分享每次雅思考試大作文范文及解析,希望對(duì)各位備考考生們有所幫助,對(duì)雅思寫作有所提高!本文是5月4日雅思大作文范文及解析:廣泛使用新技術(shù)讓年輕人更容易找工作嗎。
The increasing use of technology in the workplace has made it easier for young people to find jobs and harder for older people to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
范文及解析:
解析&審題
本題問(wèn):工作場(chǎng)所廣泛使用技術(shù)讓年輕人比年紀(jì)大的人更容易找到工作,你是否同意?
可以看到,本題的題干中包含了一個(gè)因果關(guān)系,即“工作場(chǎng)所廣泛使用技術(shù)”導(dǎo)致“年輕人更容易找到工作”。因此,這是一個(gè)“因果關(guān)系” 的題目。就這類題目,我們最好對(duì)“因”和“果”都做出反應(yīng)。比如,我們可以承認(rèn)“因”,但否認(rèn)這個(gè)“因”必然導(dǎo)致那個(gè)“果”。當(dāng)然,我們也可以直接否認(rèn)“因”,因此也就否認(rèn)“果”了。
對(duì)于“因果關(guān)系”類題目,我們一般采取以上第一種做法,即承認(rèn)“因”,但不承認(rèn)“果”。就本題而言,我們可以承認(rèn)“工作場(chǎng)所現(xiàn)在的確廣泛使用了新科技”,并承認(rèn)這種情況有可能導(dǎo)致年輕人更容易找工作,但接下來(lái)就要反向思維,討論廣泛使用新科技并不絕對(duì)導(dǎo)致年紀(jì)大的人不容易找工作,事實(shí)上,年紀(jì)大的人在工作市場(chǎng)上有其自身優(yōu)勢(shì),比如工作更投入,更有經(jīng)驗(yàn)(甚至有些年紀(jì)大的人也能學(xué)會(huì)使用新科技)。
老師筆記
01
These days, young people seem to find it easier to get employed than the older ones.One possible reason why this happens is that young workers are mostly“tech-smarter”than their older counterparts.This notion does make sense because sometimes the older persons just cannot “do” technology:not being able to figure out how to use a smart-phone or send email, for example. Since the age factor matters in the workplace that particularly stresses the use of technology, job applicants in their 20s are preferred for being “digital natives” and those in their 30s are acceptable for being “tech-savvy.” Nevertheless, those in their 40s are seldom tolerated, not to mention those in their 50s or older who are likely to have trouble adapting to new tricks.
如今,年輕人似乎比年紀(jì)大的人更容易找到工作。這種情況發(fā)生的一個(gè)可能的原因是,年輕人比他們的老同事更“技術(shù)聰明”。這一看法很有道理,因?yàn)橛袝r(shí)年紀(jì)大一些的人就是不能“搞”技術(shù):例如,弄不清楚如何使用智能手機(jī)或發(fā)送電子郵件。由于年齡因素在特別強(qiáng)調(diào)技術(shù)使用的工作場(chǎng)所很重要,20多歲的求職者受人歡迎,因?yàn)樗麄兪恰皵?shù)字化土著人”,30多歲的求職者也被人接受,因?yàn)樗麄兪恰凹夹g(shù)能手”。然而,40多歲的求職者很少被容忍,更不用說(shuō)50多歲或以上的求職者了,因?yàn)樗麄兒芸赡軣o(wú)法適應(yīng)新玩意。
解析
(1) 本段回應(yīng)題目中的觀點(diǎn):新技術(shù)的使用的確讓適應(yīng)新技術(shù)的年輕更容易找到工作。
(2) counterparts 對(duì)應(yīng)的人或物
(3) Figure out 弄清楚;理解
(4) Savvy 有見(jiàn)識(shí)的;有知識(shí)的;精通的
(5) Tolerate 容忍
(6) Not to mention... 更不用說(shuō)......
(7) Have trouble doing... 做......有困難
02
However, it does not necessarily mean that the young are always in the better position to find a job simply because they better at new technologies. Many older people can actually get used to using technology skills if they are given the opportunity to do so. Moreover, according to a survey, workers aged 40 and up are among the most engaged members of the workforce, even though most of them would learn less, remember less, and take longer to master technology skills than do most younger workers. The same survey has also revealed that many employed older people are able to combine what they have learned in technology with seasoned communication skills in real life. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the average age of an outstanding entrepreneur is 45, not 25, and there are more top-ranking managers over 50 than 35.
然而,這并不一定意味著年輕人僅僅是因?yàn)樯瞄L(zhǎng)新技術(shù)就總是更能找到工作。實(shí)際上,如果有機(jī)會(huì),許多老年人可以習(xí)慣于使用技術(shù)技能。更重要的是,根據(jù)一項(xiàng)調(diào)查,40歲及以上的工人是勞動(dòng)力中最投入的,盡管相比于多數(shù)更年輕的工人而言,他們大多數(shù)人學(xué)習(xí)更少,記住更少,掌握技術(shù)技能需要更長(zhǎng)時(shí)間。同一項(xiàng)調(diào)查還顯示,許多就業(yè)的年齡大一些的人能夠?qū)⑺麄儗W(xué)到的技術(shù)知識(shí)與在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中豐富的溝通技巧結(jié)合起來(lái)。因此,杰出企業(yè)家的平均年齡是45歲,而不是25歲,50歲以上的高級(jí)管理人員多于35歲,這不足為奇。
解析
(1) 本段回應(yīng)對(duì)題目觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行反駁:新技術(shù)技能并不是找工作的決定因素,因此年輕人并不會(huì)因?yàn)闀?huì)新技術(shù)而更容易找到工作。
(2) To be in the position to do... 能夠做......
(3) Engaged 熱心的;投入的
(4) Combine A with B 將A和B結(jié)合起來(lái)
(5) Seasoned 豐富的;老道的
(6) It should come as no surprise that... ......是不足為奇的
03
To sum up, conventional thinking assumes that older job-seekers are relatively not as “tech-savvy” as younger ones. To my mind, however, “tech” and “old” are not opposites, and there are far more factors than technology skills to consider in the decision of the employers.
綜上所述,傳統(tǒng)思想認(rèn)為,老年求職者與年輕求職者相比,沒(méi)有那么“技術(shù)精通”。然而,在我看來(lái),“技術(shù)”和“老”并不是對(duì)立的,而且在雇主的決定中,考慮的因素遠(yuǎn)不止技術(shù)技能這一項(xiàng)。
解析
(1) 本段結(jié)論,重申自己的觀點(diǎn)。
(2) assume 認(rèn)為;假設(shè)
(3) Job seekers 求職的人
(4) To my mind 我認(rèn)為
高分范文
These days, young people seem to find it easier to get employed than the older ones. One possible reason why this happens is that young workers are mostly “tech-smarter” than their older counterparts. This notion does make sense because sometimes the older persons just cannot “do” technology: not being able to figure out how to use a smart-phone or send email, for example. Since the age factor matters in the workplace that particularly stresses the use of technology, job applicants in their 20s are preferred for being “digital natives” and those in their 30s are acceptable for being “tech-savvy.” Nevertheless, those in their 40s are seldom tolerated, not to mention those in their 50s or older who are likely to have trouble adapting to new tricks.
However, it does not necessarily mean that the young are always in the better position to find a job simply because they better at new technologies. Many older people can actually get used to using technology skills if they are given the opportunity to do so. Moreover, according to a survey, workers aged 40 and up are among the most engaged members of the workforce, even though most of them would learn less, remember less, and take longer to master technology skills than do most younger workers. The same survey has also revealed that many employed older people are able to combine what they have learned in technology with seasoned communication skills in real life. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the average age of an outstanding entrepreneur is 45, not 25, and there are more top-ranking managers over 50 than 35.
To sum up, conventional thinking assumes that older job-seekers are relatively not as “tech-savvy” as younger ones. To my mind, however, “tech” and “old” are not opposites, and there are far more factors than technology skills to consider in the decision of the employers.
建議背誦的句子
1. Since the age factor matters in the workplace that particularly stresses the use of technology, job applicants in their 20s are preferred for being “digital natives” and those in their 30s are acceptable for being “tech-savvy.”
由于年齡因素在特別強(qiáng)調(diào)技術(shù)使用的工作場(chǎng)所很重要,20多歲的求職者受人歡迎,因?yàn)樗麄兪恰皵?shù)字化土著人”,30多歲的求職者也被人接受,因?yàn)樗麄兪恰凹夹g(shù)能手”。
2. Moreover, according to a survey, workers aged 40 and up are among the most engaged members of the workforce, even though most of them would learn less, remember less, and take longer to master technology skills than do most younger workers.
更重要的是,根據(jù)一項(xiàng)調(diào)查,40歲及以上的工人是勞動(dòng)力中最投入的,盡管相比于多數(shù)更年輕的工人而言,他們大多數(shù)人學(xué)習(xí)更少,記住更少,掌握技術(shù)技能需要更長(zhǎng)時(shí)間。
3. The same survey has also revealed that many employed older people are able to combine what they have learned in technology with seasoned communication skills in real life.
同一項(xiàng)調(diào)查還顯示,許多就業(yè)的年齡大一些的人能夠?qū)⑺麄儗W(xué)到的技術(shù)知識(shí)與在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中豐富的溝通技巧結(jié)合起來(lái)。
4. To my mind, however, “tech” and “old” are not opposites, and there are far more factors than technology skills to consider in the decision of the employers.
然而,在我看來(lái),“技術(shù)”和“老”并不是對(duì)立的,而且在雇主的決定中,考慮的因素遠(yuǎn)不止技術(shù)技能這一項(xiàng)。
以上就是2019年5月4日雅思考試大作文范文及解析,想要了解更多雅思資訊,請(qǐng)關(guān)注雅思頻道 。
免費(fèi)獲取資料
班級(jí)名稱 | 班號(hào) | 開(kāi)課時(shí)間 | 人數(shù) | 學(xué)費(fèi) | 報(bào)名 |
---|
免責(zé)聲明
1、如轉(zhuǎn)載本網(wǎng)原創(chuàng)文章,情表明出處
2、本網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)載媒體稿件旨在傳播更多有益信息,并不代表同意該觀點(diǎn),本網(wǎng)不承擔(dān)稿件侵權(quán)行為的連帶責(zé)任;
3、如本網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)載稿、資料分享涉及版權(quán)等問(wèn)題,請(qǐng)作者見(jiàn)稿后速與新航道聯(lián)系(電話:021-64380066),我們會(huì)第一時(shí)間刪除。
制作:每每
旗艦校區(qū):上海徐匯區(qū)文定路209號(hào)寶地文定商務(wù)中心1樓 乘車路線:地鐵1/4號(hào)線上海體育館、3/9號(hào)線宜山路站、11號(hào)線上海游泳館站
電話:4008-125-888
版權(quán)所有:上海胡雅思投資管理有限公司 滬ICP備11042568號(hào)-1